Two brain teasers for the summer

When driving back with my kids from the South of France (Bandol) to my native Belgium last week, we hit a combined afternoon rush hour / tourists passing traffic jam in the area of Lyon, on the so-called ‘rocade’ (for the experts, the tunnel de la Fourvière was also jammed). I told my kids that we were lucky to have that traffic jam on a highway portion where your speed is limited to 90 km/h. Usually you can drive 130 km/h on the French highways.

Way further up North, in the area of Reims/Cambrai, where everything was driving really smoothly and the kids were sleeping, I was thinking: Is it really so? Does it matter on your total travel time where you hit a traffic jam: Is losing 45 minutes on a 90 km/h section any different than losing 45 minutes on a 130 km/h section? I believe not.

This brought me back to a similar query I had some years ago:

Suppose you are at the airport and have to run from one side to the other to catch your next flight.  Half of your route is just plain ground, the other half are people movers (i.e. flat escalators).
You suddenly realise you have to tie your shoe laces.

Now, where would you do it? On plain ground or on the slowly moving people mover, and why?  Or would you proceed at a slower speed until the boarding gate?

For the sake of this mental exercise, assume you will not be run over, nor would you get sued for making somebody fall. And if you do stop, you may also ignore the time spent slowing down and getting back to your original speed.

Now, what do you think:

Does it matter where you hit a traffic jam?

Where would you tie your shoe laces? What are the parameters to take into consideration?

(Remark: If you tie your shoe laces on the people mover, you obviously lose time in a maximum speed section…)

Enjoy the summer !

P.S. Also posted on LinkedIn in April 2009: A small mathematics question: Where would [you] tie your shoe laces, and why?

About MvanWunnik
Independent Project Manager for Financial projects (Consolidation, Control & Reporting) at ARSIMA Projects, Financial Strategist for starters/SME's at FinanceCoach24.com

2 Responses to Two brain teasers for the summer

  1. Guy Himschoot says:

    IMHO if the traffic jam is a full stop there’s no diffrence where it happens. If (like in real life) you can generate some speed it’s better to have it in the 90 km/h zone.

    • MvanWunnik says:

      Guy, indeed, you are right! Thanks.
      I did not consider the difference between a full stop and still driving, albeit slowly.
      Yet, the final resulting time difference would still be quite small I think.
      In a ’10 km/h for one hour’-traffic jam, the time difference I calculate is only approx. 2 minutes (i.e. the time difference of driving 10 km at 90 km/h versus at 130 km/). Obviously, if the average ‘slow’ traffic speed is higher or the time spent stuck in the traffic jam is longer, or both, the final resulting time difference will increase.
      P.S. In our Lyon-case, it was 45 minutes for 9 km, so a difference of 1m51s in my logic here above.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: